|
Author
|
Topic: Mail in voting.
|
handycat
Player
Member # 2323
|
posted 07-31-2020 08:26 AM
I’m firmly opposed to it. We have a system in place that allows for absentee voting. If you have a legitimate reason, such as a riot scheduled on Election Day, you simply have to request an absentee ballot.
Posts: 5469 | From: decatur ill. | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged
|
|
MEL
Player
Member # 141
|
posted 07-31-2020 09:43 AM
Totally agree. Way too many things could go wrong with mail in voting. There is enough problems with counting votes now. That would be a headache and a major chance for possible cheating (by either side).
MEL
Posts: 2796 | From: Greeley, CO, USA | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged
|
|
Jarcat
Player
Member # 95
|
posted 07-31-2020 12:04 PM
The biggest problem with it is there is no way to verify who you are. I voted in the primary this way and I thought at the time this was ridiculous. The only thing needed was a witness of someone who would sign saying you were who you say you are.
--------------------
The truth is out there
Posts: 3014 | From: Lexington, KY | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged
|
|
MEL
Player
Member # 141
|
posted 07-31-2020 01:58 PM
I voted that way also but didn't have to have a witness, just sign it and mail it in.
A witness could very easily be someone that is in on it with the one that votes on someone else's stolen ballot.
MEL
Posts: 2796 | From: Greeley, CO, USA | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic