|
Author
|
Topic: Will Mitch look at Chad Morris?
|
boomdaddy
Player
Member # 2644
|
posted 11-18-2012 08:40 AM
This guy is putting up big O numbers and he is not too old, around 44.
Link
Link
Link
Link
Posts: 8791 | From: paris, ky | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged
|
|
FlaCatz
Player
Member # 925
|
posted 11-18-2012 12:13 PM
Now THATs a coach you can go after..... Young, inteligent and gonna be hot on most peoples list (Auburn, UT etc).... GRAB him NOW, Grab him FIRST!!
Give him an opportunity to run his version of Fast Break on the Grass... Recruit in Texas (Dallas) and sell them on the same SEC Kool-Aide that Texas A&M is not swlling..
BCS Top 4 for the playoff ranking.... as of today...
#1 Notre Dame
#2 Alabama
#3 Georgia
#4 Florida......
Now you tell me the SEC is not the best football conference of the century!
--------------------
Pray for our Service Members and their families left behind!
Posts: 8880 | From: Lawrenceburg, Indiana | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tiptree
Administrator
Member # 844
|
posted 11-19-2012 07:21 AM
From the story, he certainly sounds like someone worth a long, hard look.
That kind of offense, coupled with a solid defense, would bring a lot of fans back into Commonwealth Stadium. I was surprised to read that his Tulsa team was in the top 15 in both rushing AND passing. That makes his version of the spread offense much more interesting to me than the "Air Raid" version.
If we did hire somebody like that as head coach, he would need to get a solid defensive coordinator to come with him, and an offensive coordinator that would implement his system. His relative inexperience in the college ranks might imply that his rolodex isn't chock full of names he could call on. THAT might be a big problem.
--------------------
Tiptree
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 13672 | From: Terre Haute, IN | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic